More to come.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images

More to come.

That big, $25 billion mortgage settlement that we've been hearing about forever is finally done. The deal involves five big banks and grew out of the robo-signing scandal, where bank employees signed off on thousands of foreclosure documents without reading them.

The biggest chunk of the settlement will go toward reducing what underwater borrowers owe on their mortgages. (To be underwater on your mortgage is to owe more than your home is worth).

The settlement will help an estimated 1 million homeowners. But 11 million homeowners are underwater. And while many of those people will continue to pay their mortgage, others are likely to go into foreclosure.

In fact, the foreclosure process slowed significantly last year, as negotiations over the settlement dragged on and banks waited for the details to become clear. Now that there's a settlement in place, the rate of foreclosures is likely to pick up.

Read More: Banks may repossess more than 1 million homes this year
Newspapers are seen for sale at a newsstand Sept. 16, 2008, in New York City. U.S. stocks were mixed after the Dow Jones industrial average plunged 4.4 percent or 504 points.
Enlarge Mario Tama/Getty Images

Newspapers are seen for sale at a newsstand Sept. 16, 2008, in New York City. U.S. stocks were mixed after the Dow Jones industrial average plunged 4.4 percent or 504 points.
Mario Tama/Getty Images

Turn on the news on any given day, and you're likely to hear about the Dow Jones industrial average. It is the most frequently checked, and cited, proxy of U.S. economic health. But a lot of people — maybe most — don't even know what it is. It's just the stock prices of 30 big companies, summed up and roughly averaged. That's it.

And what does the daily movement of this number have to do with the lives of most Americans? Not much.

Read More: Even the guy in charge of the Dow doesn't check it every day

An update and a warning:

Update: An archive of Planet Money podcasts going all the way back to June of '09 is now available on iTunes. Enjoy!

Warning: If your iTunes is set to "download all" for the Planet Money podcast, you may suddenly find you are downloading 301 Planet Money podcasts. Beware!

To check this setting, go to your podcasts in iTunes, and click the "settings" button at the bottom of the page. Make sure you're set to "Download the most recent one."

Here's a screen grab:

screengrab
screengrab
.

Thanks, and sorry for any inconvenience.

NEW YORK - OCTOBER 09: People walk beneath a Times Square news ticker reading "Dow Plunges More Than 678 To Fall Below 9,000"" October 9, 2008 in New York City. The Dow Jones industrials lost 678 points to close below 8,600 today as the financial crisis deepens. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Enlarge Mario Tama/Getty Images

NEW YORK - OCTOBER 09: People walk beneath a Times Square news ticker reading "Dow Plunges More Than 678 To Fall Below 9,000"" October 9, 2008 in New York City. The Dow Jones industrials lost 678 points to close below 8,600 today as the financial crisis deepens. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Mario Tama/Getty Images

Below is an excerpt from Adam Davidson's latest New York Times Magazine column, "Why Do We Still Care About the Dow?" Read all of Davidson's Times Magazine columns here.

Why do we still care so much about the Dow? It remains not only a rough measure of stock performance but also the most frequently checked, and cited, proxy of U.S. economic health...

The Dow average, drawn out to two decimal places, may seem like some perfectly scientific number, but it's far from it. A small committee selects 30 big companies — I.B.M., G.E., McDonald's, Disney and so forth — and then adds up the price of their stocks. Then the analysts divide it by the Dow Divisor, a misleadingly precise-seeming number formulated to account for things like dividends and splits that right now is, well, about 0.132129493. The resulting figure is repeated throughout the country...

Read More: The Dow's biggest flaw - it doesn't help us make sense of our economy.

Tags: New York Times Magazine Columns

Bank.
vistavision/Flickr

Can we have a banking system that provides good services to people at reasonable rates? A banking system that doesn't bring down the global economy every few decades?

Anat Admati thinks we can. She's a finance professor at Stanford, but she never paid much attention to banks until the financial crisis. (This is not unusual in the superspecialized world of academia.)

After the crisis hit, Admati started reading up on banks. And, in a basic banking textbook, she came upon a single line that changed her career.

"I sat in my office and I thought, 'Something is really wrong in banking.' "

On today's show, Admati tells us what she thinks is wrong in banking — and how she thinks we can fix it.

Subscribe to the podcast. Music: The Pains Of Being Pure At Heart's "Belong." Find us: Twitter/ Facebook/ Spotify.

shoppers
Enlarge Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images

shoppers
Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images

The economists who predicted the housing crisis tend to be a gloomy bunch, as Adam Davidson notes in his latest Times Magazine column. Dean Baker is the rare exception. In the following guest post, he explains why he has parted ways with the economic pessimists.

For more than five years before the recession began in December of 2007, I was one of the leading economic pessimists, warning of the housing bubble and the damage that its collapse would do to the economy. I based this pessimism on my analysis of the housing market, not a genetic disposition to pessimism. Given the economy's current situation, I find the warnings of the pessimists – the double-dip gang – to be wrongheaded and seriously counterproductive.

First to the economy's near-term prospects: the economy is growing and will in all probability continue to grow. Economies do generally grow. We see new investment, leading to more employment and higher productivity, which leads to higher profits and higher wages.

Read More: There seems little prospect that the economy will crater on its own.
Now read 15 more.
NPR

Now read 15 more.

A while back, the MIT economist Andrew Lo set out to review a couple books about the financial crisis. Those books led to a couple more books, which led — you see where this is going — to 17 more books.

Now, Lo is about to publish "Reading About The Financial Crisis: A 21-Book Review" (PDF).

Reading 21 books about the financial crisis does not sound, on its face, like a fun experience. After you talk to Lo, it sounds even worse.

Read More: "After each book, I felt like I knew less."
INDIANAPOLIS, IN - FEBRUARY 01: An official Super Bowl XLVI sign is seen in front of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument prior to Super Bowl XLVI between the New York Giants and the New England Patriots on February 1, 2012 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Scott Halleran/Getty Images)
Enlarge Scott Halleran/Getty Images

INDIANAPOLIS, IN - FEBRUARY 01: An official Super Bowl XLVI sign is seen in front of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument prior to Super Bowl XLVI between the New York Giants and the New England Patriots on February 1, 2012 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Scott Halleran/Getty Images)
Scott Halleran/Getty Images

This is what it's like to host the Super Bowl: For one weekend, your city is the focus of the sporting universe. Fans flock in droves. They eat at your restaurants and sleep in your hotels. They buy the "I ♥ [your city]" t-shirts.

The NFL estimates that hosting the country's premier sporting event will give the local economy a $300-500 million jolt.

Economist Victor Matheson of the College of Holy Cross doesn't buy it.

In today's podcast, co-hosted from Indianapolis by NPR's Mike Pesca, Matheson presents the case against hosting the Super Bowl.

He argues hosting the Super Bowl pushes out the economic activities that occur on normal, non-Super Bowl hosting weekends. No conventions are held. Museums are closed. Local residents do not come downtown simply because it's too crowded.

What's more, Matheson says, the majority of the money that's shelled out by out-of-towners does not even stay in the city. It flows to the big, national hotel companies and restaurant chains.

"More money than average is being spent in hotels and restaurants, but is then immediately leaving town...you have lots of dollars changing hands but it's really money being sucked out of people's hands and disappearing, rather than money that goes to build the local economy or repay a big stadium subsidy."

Subscribe to the podcast. Music: Johnny Pearson's "Heavy Action" and Faith Hill's "Waiting For Sunday Night." Find us: Twitter/ Facebook/ Spotify.

Old school.
Steve Snodgrass/Flickr

Old school.

Ron Silver, the owner of Bubby's restaurant in Brooklyn, recently put a word on his menu you don't often see anymore: lard. The white, creamy, processed fat from a pig. And he didn't use the word just once.

For a one-night-only "Lard Exoneration Dinner", Silver served up lard fried potatoes. And root vegetables, baked in lard. Fried chicken, fried in lard. Roasted fennel glazed with lard sugar and sea salt. Pies, with lard inside and out. All from lard he made himself in the kitchen.

"It seems funny," Silver says, "but for thousands of years this was the thing that people cooked with.

A century ago, lard was in every American pantry and fryer. These days, lard is an insult.

"The word lard has become this generally derogatory term associated with fat and disgustingness," says Dan Pashman who hosts a food podcast called The Sporkful. "Think about Lard-ass, the character from the movie Stand By Me. I mean, he didn't want to be called Lard-ass."

How did this delicious, all-natural fat from a pig become an insult? Who killed lard?

Lard didn't just fall out of favor. It was pushed. It was a casualty of a battle between giant business and corporate interests.

Read More: The lard-industrial complex

 

Today's big jobs report is full of good news. A few key details:

* The U.S. added 243,000 jobs last month. Manufacturing, the sector that got hit hardest during the recession, added 50,000 jobs. Construction, which also got walloped, added 21,000 jobs.

* The unemployment rate fell to 8.3 percent — the lowest since February, 2009.

* A broader measure of unemployment fell to 15.1 percent. This measure includes those who have given up looking for work over the past year as well as those working part time because they can't find a full-time job.

In absolute terms, the job market is still in bad shape: Before the recession, an unemployment rate of 8.3 percent would have been viewed as a disaster. There are five million fewer U.S. jobs today than there were five years ago.

But the trend over the past few months is very promising. Not only is the economy adding jobs; the rate of job growth is accelerating. The job market is getting better, faster.

Bonus Graphic:

 

As of the end of last year, unemployment rate for college-educated people in their 30s and 40s was just 3 percent. For people in their early 20s without a high-school degree, the unemployment rate was 20 percent.

Which is to say that the single number usually used to describe the U.S. labor market — the unemployment rate — obscures multitudes.

You can use the chart above to see how the unemployment rate has changed over time for people of all ages and all levels of educational attainment. The chart shows annual averages through 2011. Seasonally-adjusted monthly data aren't available at this level of detail.

An American Airlines plane flies over a highway in Queens, New York City on Sept. 13, 2009.
Mario Tama/Getty Images

American Airlines filed for bankruptcy in November. The company needs $18.5 billion to cover its pension promises to current and former employees, but it has only set aside $8.3 billion.

Taxpayers could wind up on the hook for billions. Here's why.

Read More: A $26 billion shortfall that's about to get bigger
Nouriel Roubini, alias, "Dr. Doom."
Enlarge Amy Sussman/Getty Images

Nouriel Roubini, alias, "Dr. Doom."

Nouriel Roubini, alias, "Dr. Doom."
Amy Sussman/Getty Images

Nouriel Roubini, alias, "Dr. Doom."

Below is Adam Davidson's latest New York Times Magazine column, "It Is Safe To Resume Ignoring The Prophets Of Doom...Right?" Read all of Davidson's Times Magazine columns here.

I remember the first time I interviewed a relatively unknown economist named Nouriel Roubini. It was 2005, and as we sat in his New York University office, he laid out his scary vision of the future. Roubini is a specialist in the flow of money around the world and the crises that (sometimes) result. But on that day he wanted to talk about the U.S. housing market.

Homeowners, he said, had become too used to financing their lifestyles with money siphoned from overvalued homes. This housing bubble would pop, he warned, and send the world into a vicious recession, possibly even a depression. I remember leaving his office both stunned and confused. Only after calling a few leading economists was I reassured that this Roubini guy was expressing a fringe view that merited little attention. Like a lot of reporters that year, I turned around a tongue-in-cheek story about Dr. Doom and his scary (but probably best ignored) world view. Oops!

Read More: Once the crisis hit, it became popular to scour the past for apocalyptic predictions that had come true.

Tags: New York Times Magazine Columns

Instapaper screenshot
NPR

On today's show, we hear how a hobby turns into a lucrative one-man business — and how Apple's App Store is transforming the Internet economy.

The gist is super simple. In fact, it's something that's been going on in the physical world for thousands of years: Giving people a convenient way to buy cheap products.

Read More: Meet Marco Arment, the founder of Instapaper

NPR thanks our sponsors

Become an NPR Sponsor

Blog Contributors

Adam Davidson

Correspondent

Alex Blumberg

Contributing Editor

David Kestenbaum

Correspondent

Chana Joffe-Walt

Correspondent

Jacob Goldstein

Correspondent

Caitlin Kenney

Associate Producer

Jess Jiang

Production Assistant

About Us

Planet Money is a multimedia team covering the global economy.

Contact Us

You can follow us on this blog, Facebook and Twitter, and you can also e-mail us directly.

Podcast + RSS Feeds

Podcast RSS

  • Planet Money
     
  • Planet Money
     
 

Interactive

This graphic requires version 10 or higher of the Adobe Flash Player.Get the latest Flash Player.

Planet Money podcast player.

Access Archived Stories